Can you start a sentence with with

It only takes a minute to sign up. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search. I think it sounds better because, as I understand it, in English it is more natural to put the result at the beginning of the sentence, and then the contributing factors or background information after that.

There's nothing grammatically wrong with that construction. In fact it's quite common. It's an example of a dependent clause. You can use any subordinating conjunctions in this way. However, I will agree that it sounds a bit odd for other reasons. The development of the economy speaks of the development almost as if it was a single event. Personally, I'd write it like this:. Or we can go to the roller rink. We can go to the drive-in, or we can go to the roller rink.

Yet, she still attended the meeting. Real-time suggestions, wherever you write. Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Oooh, that made me stop and double back. Example How about revision there…and eliminating the split infinitive? Please set off the sheep from the wolves. Please set off the appositives with commas.

Please use great care when you set off a charge of dynamite. Without a hope or a prayer, the few survivors set off across the boundless wasteland without any supplies. Skip to content. In a nutshell, yes! End the misconception about and Many of the old-school grammarists believe that it is rather inelegant to start a sentence with and. A simple sentence starting with and can look like this: And then she yelled. Now imagine the sentence preceding it was: Anne saw the mouse poke its face out of the hole.

This is much more impactful and memorable than: Anne saw the mouse poke its face out of the hole, and then she yelled. And in conclusion… Well, there you have it. Become a writer.